Legal Tensions: ODPP Threatens action against Ssemakadde

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) has expressed strong disapproval of remarks made by Isaac Ssemakadde, the President of the Uganda Law Society (ULS), in a video circulating on social media. In a detailed press release dated November 20, 2024, the ODPP described Ssemakadde’s statements targeting Hon. Lady Justice Jane Frances Abodo, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), as “highly derogatory, inflammatory, and despicable.” This development has amplified ongoing debates about professionalism and accountability in Uganda’s legal fraternity.

The ODPP accused Ssemakadde of using vulgar language and personal attacks against the DPP, labeling his actions as a breach of professional ethics and an affront to the rule of law. “Mr. Ssemakadde’s comments represent a breach of professional and ethical standards, undermining the rule of law and prosecutorial constitutionalism, a threat to institutional integrity, and an affront to public discourse,” the statement read.

The ODPP further emphasized that such remarks should never come from a leader of a professional body tasked with upholding justice and the legal system’s integrity.

At the center of the controversy is Hon. Justice Jane Frances Abodo, who has served in Uganda’s judiciary for over 23 years, building a reputation as a principled and impartial prosecutor. The ODPP reaffirmed her exemplary track record, noting that she is a double-appointed judge and prosecutor whose integrity is beyond reproach.

Highlighting her commitment to justice, the ODPP condemned the personal nature of Ssemakadde’s attacks, stating, “Personal attacks and unprofessional rhetoric will not deter or intimidate the ODPP from fulfilling its constitutional mandate to serve the people of Uganda.”

The ODPP’s response comes amid broader concerns about accountability within the legal community. It demanded an immediate public apology from Ssemakadde, while also reserving the right to pursue legal action to ensure that his conduct is addressed within the framework of professional accountability. “We unequivocally condemn Mr. Ssemakadde’s statements and will work with relevant professional bodies to address this behavior,” stated Jacquelyn Okui, the ODPP’s Public Relations Officer.

This controversy comes just a day after a faction of the ULS publicly distanced itself from Ssemakadde’s remarks. In a statement dated November 19, 2024, regional representatives of the ULS condemned the president’s comments, describing them as vulgar and unbecoming of the society’s leadership. “The views expressed in the video do not represent the official stance of the Uganda Law Society,” read the statement signed by key representatives, including Phillip Munaabi (Secretary), Samuel Muhumuza (Western Region Rep), Turyamusiima Geoffrey (Central Region Rep), and Egaru O. Emmanuel (Northern Region Rep).

This division within the ULS highlights broader tensions within the legal fraternity. While some members have called for immediate disciplinary action against Ssemakadde, others have urged dialogue to restore unity and professionalism within the society.

The ODPP’s response also reflects a broader struggle to uphold ethical standards in Uganda’s legal and judicial systems. The office reiterated its commitment to administering justice impartially and protecting the constitutional rights of Ugandans. “We urge all Ugandans to focus on building a society grounded in mutual respect, the rule of law, and the shared goal of justice for all,” the statement concluded.

Ssemakadde’s remarks have reignited discussions about the limits of free speech and the responsibilities of public officials. As a leader of a key professional body, his comments are seen by many as setting a dangerous precedent for public discourse in Uganda. With the ODPP hinting at possible legal action and the ULS faction distancing itself from their president, the case underscores the need for accountability and respect in leadership.

As the legal community continues to grapple with the fallout from this incident, it remains to be seen how both the ODPP and the ULS will proceed. Will Ssemakadde issue the public apology demanded by the ODPP? Or will legal action follow, setting a significant precedent for professional conduct in Uganda’s legal profession?

For now, the spotlight remains on the broader implications of this controversy. At its core, the incident is a reminder of the vital role integrity and professionalism play in safeguarding public confidence in Uganda’s justice system. Both the ODPP and ULS factions appear united in their resolve to protect these principles, even as they navigate the challenges of internal and external accountability.