Opposition questions UNEB’s new grading System
The controversy stems from UNEB’s new grading model, which classifies students into Result 1, Result 2, or Result 3 categories instead of using traditional divisions.
The opposition in Parliament has criticized the Uganda National Examinations Board (UNEB) over its handling of student assessments under the new lower secondary curriculum, raising concerns about credibility and fairness.
Shadow Education Minister Joseph Ssewungu Gonzaga accused UNEB of failing to oversee project-based assessments in schools, arguing that the results may not reflect students’ true abilities.
“The collection and transmission of continuous assessment marks posed significant challenges, especially for schools without computers, electricity, or internet. How can we trust these scores?” Ssewungu, the MP for Kalungu West, asked in Parliament.
The controversy stems from UNEB’s new grading model, which classifies students into Result 1, Result 2, or Result 3 categories instead of using traditional divisions. Critics say this system makes it appear as though all students in Result 1 excelled, while those in lower categories are denied certificates, even if they completed most subjects.
Ssewungu also faulted UNEB for failing to verify the 20% continuous assessment component, warning that some schools may have awarded marks to students who didn’t complete project work. “Without UNEB oversight, what stops schools from forging marks?” he questioned.
The opposition further criticized the government’s decision to drop a parallel certification program by the Directorate of Industrial Training (DIT), which was meant to complement UNEB qualifications.
MPs urged the government to improve teacher training, recruit more educators for subjects like Kiswahili, and invest in ICT infrastructure to support the curriculum rollout. Speaker Anita Among acknowledged the challenges, noting that many private and government schools still lack the necessary resources.
MPs also demanded clarity on the Uganda Advanced Certificate of Education (UACE) curriculum, which remains unpublished despite Senior Five students set to begin studies.
With growing concerns from parents, educators, and lawmakers, the government is under pressure to address gaps in the new grading system and ensure a fair and transparent evaluation process for students.
